Now is the summer of our disco tent is a user on mst3k.interlinked.me. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse. If you don't, you can sign up here.
Now is the summer of our disco tent @Elizafox

SO JUST A PSA FOR EVERYONE

BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU POST - TREAT IT LIKE IT IS PERMANENT

"Oh but there's a delete button."

INSTANCES DON'T HAVE TO OBEY IT.

UNLESS YOU KNOW 100% OF YOUR FOLLOWERS AND TRUST THEM TO HONOUR IT, ASSUME IT'S PERMANENT

A HACKED INSTANCE CAN IGNORE THE DELETE REQUEST AND ARCHIVE IT.

IT CAN BE USED AS BLACKMAIL AGAINST YOU OR SOMETHING FUCKO LIKE THAT.

ยท Web ยท 0 ยท 3

ALSO

ASSUME IT IS FUCKING PUBLIC

LIKE

ANYONE CAN SEE IT

YOU SHOULD BE DOING THAT ANYWAY ON ALL SOCIAL MEDIA

DON'T ASSUME WHAT HAPPENS IN YOUR FEED STAYS IN YOUR FEED

EVEN WITH PRIVACY SETTINGS UP TO 11

SOMEONE CAN COPYPASTE IT OR SCREENSHOT IT

AND YOU COULD BE FUCKED

PEOPLE WHO ARE FOLLOWER-VIEW-ONLY ON TWITTER HAVE BEEN FUCKED BY THIS

@Elizafox it is permanent.

Sites like archive.is have proven this. They even have some secret mod-only Reddit posts. And those are fairly provable, unlike screenshots.

@Elizafox

โ€”
Thats a great idea!

โ€”
The Internet archive should start archiving toots...

@Elizafox I wonder if it makes any practical difference, as you can use birdsite API to archive posts, and many people do

@Elizafox yup, this is totally correct. I was actually confused by the delete messages that I was getting at the start - didn't realise there was even provision for it in the protocol. It's probably useful to think of it more as a fix for "oops I made a typo" than "oops I posted something sensitive".

@archaeme @Elizafox yeah, it's tricky. I'm yet to read about the logic involved there. Presumably it's just "purge object with id ...", but there's a bunch of validation you'd want to do around that. Understandable that it might be a bit flimsy between different implementations.