@brwarner @Gargoylezoo The biologist in me sees it as an argument about what source of nutrients and protein are we going to use.

Multicellular life is pretty much 80% similar.

You have far more in common with a cabbage than not, genetically speaking.

Ethically, feelings always come into it. I don't know how to process those but in any case we should at least reduce the harm we cause.

@Elizafox @brwarner of we want to go the natural route, then insects are really the way to do it. They can be grown in massively dense settings, have virtually no brain, and are 2-3x as efficient as cows at turning plants into meat.

@Elizafox @Gargoylezoo @brwarner Have you read Jonathan Haidt et al's work on moral disgust? There's a lot of research, but the one that I always remember is when they hypnotized half a group to feel disgust when seeing the word "often", the other half to feel disgust when seeing the word "take", and watched them come up with the most amazingly contrived moral justifications to justify their feeling of disgust.

@amrofnoc @Elizafox @brwarner
I think one of the issues around the whole "natural foods" thing is a bias in perceived motivation of scientists. A lot of people think they're just in it to get rich, but most of them are motivated for the same reasons the organic food people are. They want to see less pesticides, less land use, and healthier food. Most genetic engineering projects are nonprofits.

@amrofnoc @Elizafox @brwarner also, I would love to see that study!

Geez, I'm having to edit for 500 characters now. I'm too verbose.

@Gargoylezoo @Elizafox @brwarner A quick search suggests http://gruberpeplab.com/teaching/psych131_summer2013/documents/Lecture11_WheatleyHaidt2005_DisgustMoralJudgments.pdf though it is also referenced a lot in his writing (along with many other fascinating experiments), which can be more accessible than academic publications (I hate that I still have to rely on Google for finding not-paywalled copies)